Skip to main content

Saving Time

We are not saving time. We are only changing it. We are shaping time, all the time, with technology and its effect on our perception. Before the first mechanical clock ticked its first 'tock', a second was only a concept. Everyone might agree that a second is roughly equivalent to a moment, but how long is that? As Einstein pointed out, a moment with a pretty girl does not seem nearly as long, relatively speaking of course, as a moment sitting on top of a hot oven.

Songs about trains and cowboys, about ships and sailing, stories about long journeys, all resonate with a past in which time moved differently. Communication was not ubiquitous and immediate, and travel required an involvement with the land. Relationships formed more slowly and, if they prospered at all, strengthened by the necessity mandated by a smaller world. One cannot afford to burn too many bridges if one lives on an island.

Our expectations of instantaneous gratification, immense global change and a society that listens to every voice are simply unrealistic. We have asked our brains to accelerate and condense time in exponential leaps of scale within the last three decades, compared to the million-plus years of human development.

Humans have the unique ability to project a future and store a past. It is what allows creativity, complex decision making, risk analysis, all the things that make us, we presume, the predominant sentience on our planet. And that imagination also allows us to project our own truth, like a home movie, into past, present or future. Maybe we have only fooled ourselves into thinking that we can process our new hyper-dense society in real-time.

Civility between persons has not really prospered significantly from global, simultaneous communications. We have built better foundations for society, but often the rules still seem to break down at street level. In the time before time was counted, trust and intimacy could only exist between family or tribal groups, persons known to you from the beginning. While it is to our credit that we learned to wield our intellect in accepting strangers, we may have overreached our abilities to 'know' someone.

Today, from customer service encounters to Internet "flame wars", people assume a more thorough understanding of the motives and intentions of strangers than they could possibly attain through a brief exchange. Invective and enmity would not be such easy tools if the anonymous recipient were a neighbor or family member, or even a citizen in a small town. Just when the human race was on the track to common friendliness, our ability to alienate ourselves from others without consequence, through travel and anonymous communication, has give us another path. And by choosing the easy path of moral malaise, we lose a little of our humanity, the thing that has made us unique and viable.

I am not suggesting that people be nicer to each other, not in the immediate sense. Our busy, invasive society will still continue to aggravate each of us, in some way. We must make quick judgments about all the new people with whom we interact each week. But I might suggest that we remember that time is a concept of our choosing, as is our idea of how big our society really is. Can we afford to alienate one another? Do we really not have time to empathize? Can we not think about our own ideas and opinions in the reflection of past and future? Things change, and to the universe, a thousand years is much the same as a second.

Here are my only suggestions. Accept change. Luxuriate in travel. Be slow to judge. Remember that you are the director of the movie of your life, editor of hopes and dreams. Allow your happiness to exist in the moment, the only true time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"It's Turtles All the Way Down!"

I do not accept non-nature based belief systems. In other words, I accept as truth only that which is quantifiable and observable. Speculation and postulation about spirits, ghosts or some spectral intelligence which, no matter what the argument, sits at a meta-level unknowable to humans is, to me, simply a waste of time. If it will not change the temperature of the room or cause a chemical or physical reaction in matter, it does not concern me. The stock in trade of those who deal in matters spiritual seems to be faith in things unseen and a world of possibilities. Maybe there is a God. Maybe God is inside us. Maybe we are all God. Maybe God is just another intelligent being like us, who created us as an experiment. If we humans ever create a digital machine or network with even the most rudimentary ability to question, to think laterally in a cloud of fuzzy logic like we humans do, surely it will encounter the same fundamental metaphysical quandaries. Who created me? Why am I...

AP Looks At US Legislative Process, Smirks Silently

Here you'll find the Associated Press fact piece on an obscure American legislative process that will take place once again, due to Dubya's most recent shameless desecration of the Constitution. It's a nice little "Q&A" article that, to its journalistic credit, manages to avoid the question "What the flippin' f%$@ is going on in this country?" Contempt of Congress: What Is It? After reading the article, one realizes that no matter who does or does not testify, whatever the result, Dubya (supposes that) he has the power to simply nullify the consequences via executive dictat. Should we expect otherwise?

Viking Kittens

Click the Image to See the Viking Kitten Saga (Music: Led Zeppelin - "Immigrant Song")